5 sports Bluetooth headset blind test Hengping: high price, high quality experience!
Source: PConline original
Author: next door Huang, Kevin G brother
National Fitness has become the most popular vocabulary of the moment. I don't know if my friends have recently been screened by a large number of "steps" screenshots. Then, you can not underestimate the fitness word, the sports digital "devices" born, what sports bracelets, watches, especially sports Bluetooth headsets, is also very hot.
However, the current domestic sports Bluetooth headset market is somewhat confusing, and the price range from entry to high-end products is huge. Indirect, a small number of people still use "high price" to judge the pros and cons of a certain product, is it really appropriate?
In this case, isn’t the simplest blind test? ! The author has found that the market has a relatively high degree of attention, and the five products with a large price span are blindly tested. Through the results, you should also be able to discover the mystery.
In this blind test, Xiao Bian invited 20 colleagues from different departments to cooperate with the test. Separately let each of the tested colleagues enter the "small black house" prepared by Xiaobian. They were given a hood for blind testing of the wearing comfort and sound quality of the headphones.
When blindly measuring the sound quality, ask them to select a song that they usually hear the most, or favorite. Through the Netease cloud music software + Bluetooth connection, the blind listening and cross-evaluation of 5 products. At each stage, a judgement is conducted to vote for the products that they think are the most comfortable and sound quality. Not finished yet, and then, each subject was taken off the blindfold and judged the workmanship and appearance of the five products.
During the entire blind test period, the subjects were wearing eye masks throughout. At the same time, ensure that each headset is in the process of testing, the volume of the audio source (both iPhone6) is adjusted to be consistent!
Let’s take a look at who is participating in this blind test:
Sports Bluetooth headset data comparison
It is not difficult to find out that the five products in this competition ranged from a minimum of 269 to a maximum of 1299, covering the entry-level to high-end quality. The relative structural characteristics of the five products were not the same. So which product will be the winner of this blind test? Please look down!
NO.1: Blind wear comfort
In this test session, the author has selected the most suitable earphone cover size for each product, and then let each subject simulate the state of running fitness as much as possible (with headphones violently Head?!) to measure their feelings about the wearing of the five products. But...not really running, because they all wear eye masks...
A sports Bluetooth headset, or the author prefers to call them sports "devices", naturally, whether it fits well with the human ear, that is, wearing comfort is good or bad, will be a key factor affecting the user experience. At the very least, they must not be in the way when they are equipped with exercise. High-quality wearing performance can minimize the foreign body sensation brought by the earphone cavity and wire, and it can be regarded as a good device if it has no influence on the movement process. Therefore, the author believes that this may be the most important measure for consumers to purchase such products!
The following are the different ear types, the visual picture when you try these 5 products:
Philips SHQ8300
Soul run free Pro
MEIZU EP51
Iron triangle sport-4
JBL UA
Then again, we all know that even if you wear the same type of headphones (like in-ear), they can deal with different people, or different auricles, and the wearing experience is quite different. However, manufacturers are more ergonomically designed and combined with their own ID understanding of this aspect, as far as possible to design products that meet more people's ear type. To put it bluntly, this is a test that tests the design of the manufacturer!
In the blind test of wearing comfort, the voting results produced are as follows:
From the results of the voting, we can see that JBL UA won the small win of this link with the advantage of 2 votes! It seems that JBL is still in control of the design of this aspect. At the same time, the Meizu EP51 black horse's killing, it really makes people shine. But it is a pity that the iron triangle SPORT-4 actually lost in this link (the author is real iron powder)! The reason for this: the earphone wire is too hard, resulting in a poor wearing experience around the ear, the cavity is too large and heavy and easy to fall, etc., which has a great influence on the comfort of the earphone when it is in the ear.
The old yellow subjective review of the next door:
Although everyone can understand the results of the vote, in the author's mind, the Philips SHQ8300 left a good impression on me. SHQ8300 is a unique ear hook, ear solid dual-use + lug-type wearing method, no other spare parts are placed in the earphone cavity, and the whole ear feels quite light and firm. But this point of view also depends on personal preference, perhaps the proportion of people who like the ear (or ear hook) is less, perhaps because the in-ear type has become the most common use of "habits" by the public, which indirectly leads to the SHQ8300 in this link. The voting score is average.
8mm Lamp LED,LED Panel ,LED Flood Lights ,LED Lights For Home
LED Bulb Light Co., Ltd. , http://www.nbsmdled.com