Laboratory capacity verification implementation method
(National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee Announcement No. 9 of 2006)
The Measures for the Implementation of Laboratory Capability Verification has been reviewed and approved at the Office of the Director of the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee on December 27, 2005. It is hereby announced and will be implemented as of May 1, 2006.
March 13, 2006
Laboratory capacity verification implementation method
Article 1 These Measures are formulated in accordance with the duties assigned by the State Council to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee (hereinafter referred to as the State Certification and Accreditation Administration) for the establishment of a standardized laboratory capability verification working mechanism.
Article 2 The term “capability verification†as used in these Measures refers to the use of the comparison of designated test data between laboratories to determine the technical competence of the laboratory to perform specific test activities.
Article 3 The proficiency testing activities shall follow the principles of scientific rationality, operational feasibility, non-profitability and avoidance of unnecessary duplication of verification.
Article 4 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration shall, in accordance with relevant national standards and international standards, formulate basic norms and implementation rules for laboratory capability verification, and unify supervision and comprehensive coordination capability verification activities.
Article 5 The organizer of the capability verification shall carry out the capability verification activities in accordance with the basic norms and implementation rules of the laboratory capability verification formulated by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 6 The organizer of proficiency testing shall establish and maintain a proficiency verification file and related records, including:
(1) Relevant documents on the implementation of proficiency testing;
(2) Qualification certificate of the provider of the proficiency test;
(3) A record of the confirmation of the provider of the proficiency test by the organizer of the proficiency test;
(4) A list of participants in the proficiency test;
(5) Technical report on capability verification;
(6) Capability verification results and subsequent processing documents.
Article 7 The organizer of the capability verification shall report to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration at the end of each year the capability verification plan for the next year, including: name, purpose, content of capability verification and design of key technical elements, organizational unit, implementation time, and participation. The scope and quantity of the laboratory, the qualification certificate of the proficiency testing provider, and the audit materials.
The National Certification and Accreditation Administration regularly publishes approved proficiency testing plans.
Article 8 The provider of proficiency testing shall comply with the requirements of relevant national standards or technical specifications, and its technical capabilities shall be leading and sustainable in the corresponding fields and key technical elements.
Article 9 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration organizes accreditation bodies and other relevant parties to evaluate whether the providers of proficiency testing meet the requirements of relevant national standards or technical specifications. If it meets the requirements, the National Certification and Accreditation Administration determines its provider as a proficiency test.
The National Certification and Accreditation Administration encourages the organizers of proficiency testing to use providers of proficiency testing as determined by the CNCA.
Article 10 Participants in the proficiency test shall promptly report relevant information to the organizer of the proficiency test and keep relevant records.
If the results of the capability verification are out of the group, corresponding corrective actions should be taken.
Article 11 The organizer of the capability verification shall promptly notify the CNCA of the completion of the annual proficiency testing plan, the results of the capability verification, and the follow-up measures.
Article 12 Where an organization laboratory participates in the verification of the capabilities of an overseas institution or an organization of an international organization, the organizer of the territory shall report the relevant situation to the CNCA beforehand, including: the overseas organization that has the ability to verify the capability, the provider of the capability verification, The content and time of the proficiency test, the scope and quantity of the participating laboratories (the number of domestic and foreign), the plan of use of the proficiency test results, the fees paid, and the technical report of the proficiency test (subsequent reimbursement).
The capability verification provider who undertakes the capability verification activities organized by the overseas organization shall also report the above-mentioned relevant situation to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 13 The organizer of the proficiency test shall inform the relevant parties of the results of the proficiency testing activities after the completion of the proficiency testing activities. At the same time, the results of the proficiency test are reported to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration, and the National Certification and Accreditation Administration regularly publishes a list of laboratories with satisfactory results.
Article 14 The laboratory and the proficiency test provider who have achieved satisfactory results may be exempted from the on-site test of the project when they accept the laboratory qualification and laboratory accreditation assessment within the specified time.
All relevant parties are encouraged to use the results of proficiency testing to give priority to recommending or selecting laboratories that have achieved satisfactory results to undertake government inspection, authorization or designated inspection and testing tasks.
Article 15 The organizer of proficiency testing shall implement effective management of the proficiency testing provider and the implementation process of proficiency testing.
Article 16 For laboratories whose performance verification results are suspicious or outliers, the organizer of the proficiency test shall require them to rectify and verify the rectification effect within the prescribed time limit, and may also suspend or revoke the qualification certification of their related projects or may To suspend the eligibility of the government for authorization, commission, or designated inspection and testing tasks until the corrective activity is completed and confirmed by the proficiency-certified organizer before resuming or re-acquiring and undertaking government authorization, commission, or designated inspections Qualification of the task.
Article 17 If the provider of proficiency testing violates professional ethics, falsifies or reveals confidentiality, the National Certification and Accreditation Administration or the organizer of proficiency testing shall cancel the qualifications of the provider of the proficiency test.
Participants in the proficiency test are fraudulent and collusive. If the investigation is true, the proficiency test organizer will be dissatisfied with the result. If the circumstances are bad, the proficiency verification organizer shall report to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration, and the National Certification and Accreditation Administration shall cancel the qualifications for the testing of its corresponding projects.
Article 18 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration may supervise laboratory proficiency testing activities by organizing expert review, soliciting opinions from laboratories, spotting files, requiring organizers of capability verification, and reporting on the implementation of proficiency testing.
Article 19 If the participant who has the ability to verify has any objection to the result of the proficiency test, he may appeal to the proficiency verification organizer; the violation may be reported to the proficiency verification organizer or the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 20: The meaning of the following terms:
The provider of proficiency testing referred to in these Measures refers to the laboratory that is engaged in the design and implementation of proficiency testing.
Participants in the proficiency test referred to in these Procedures refer to laboratories participating in inter-laboratory comparisons to determine calibration or testing capabilities.
The suspicious results referred to in these Measures refer to the results of the proficiency test results determined by the relevant technical statistical methods between the standard recognized values ​​(or median values).
The out-of-group (ie, out-of-group) referred to in this approach refers to the result of a significant deviation from the standard value (or median value) determined according to the relevant technical statistical methods.
Article 21 The National Certification and Accreditation Administration is responsible for the interpretation of these Measures.
Article 22 These Measures shall come into force on May 1, 2006.
The authenticity of this information has not been confirmed by the international electrical network, for your reference only.
The Measures for the Implementation of Laboratory Capability Verification has been reviewed and approved at the Office of the Director of the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee on December 27, 2005. It is hereby announced and will be implemented as of May 1, 2006.
March 13, 2006
Laboratory capacity verification implementation method
Article 1 These Measures are formulated in accordance with the duties assigned by the State Council to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration Committee (hereinafter referred to as the State Certification and Accreditation Administration) for the establishment of a standardized laboratory capability verification working mechanism.
Article 2 The term “capability verification†as used in these Measures refers to the use of the comparison of designated test data between laboratories to determine the technical competence of the laboratory to perform specific test activities.
Article 3 The proficiency testing activities shall follow the principles of scientific rationality, operational feasibility, non-profitability and avoidance of unnecessary duplication of verification.
Article 4 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration shall, in accordance with relevant national standards and international standards, formulate basic norms and implementation rules for laboratory capability verification, and unify supervision and comprehensive coordination capability verification activities.
Article 5 The organizer of the capability verification shall carry out the capability verification activities in accordance with the basic norms and implementation rules of the laboratory capability verification formulated by the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 6 The organizer of proficiency testing shall establish and maintain a proficiency verification file and related records, including:
(1) Relevant documents on the implementation of proficiency testing;
(2) Qualification certificate of the provider of the proficiency test;
(3) A record of the confirmation of the provider of the proficiency test by the organizer of the proficiency test;
(4) A list of participants in the proficiency test;
(5) Technical report on capability verification;
(6) Capability verification results and subsequent processing documents.
Article 7 The organizer of the capability verification shall report to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration at the end of each year the capability verification plan for the next year, including: name, purpose, content of capability verification and design of key technical elements, organizational unit, implementation time, and participation. The scope and quantity of the laboratory, the qualification certificate of the proficiency testing provider, and the audit materials.
The National Certification and Accreditation Administration regularly publishes approved proficiency testing plans.
Article 8 The provider of proficiency testing shall comply with the requirements of relevant national standards or technical specifications, and its technical capabilities shall be leading and sustainable in the corresponding fields and key technical elements.
Article 9 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration organizes accreditation bodies and other relevant parties to evaluate whether the providers of proficiency testing meet the requirements of relevant national standards or technical specifications. If it meets the requirements, the National Certification and Accreditation Administration determines its provider as a proficiency test.
The National Certification and Accreditation Administration encourages the organizers of proficiency testing to use providers of proficiency testing as determined by the CNCA.
Article 10 Participants in the proficiency test shall promptly report relevant information to the organizer of the proficiency test and keep relevant records.
If the results of the capability verification are out of the group, corresponding corrective actions should be taken.
Article 11 The organizer of the capability verification shall promptly notify the CNCA of the completion of the annual proficiency testing plan, the results of the capability verification, and the follow-up measures.
Article 12 Where an organization laboratory participates in the verification of the capabilities of an overseas institution or an organization of an international organization, the organizer of the territory shall report the relevant situation to the CNCA beforehand, including: the overseas organization that has the ability to verify the capability, the provider of the capability verification, The content and time of the proficiency test, the scope and quantity of the participating laboratories (the number of domestic and foreign), the plan of use of the proficiency test results, the fees paid, and the technical report of the proficiency test (subsequent reimbursement).
The capability verification provider who undertakes the capability verification activities organized by the overseas organization shall also report the above-mentioned relevant situation to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 13 The organizer of the proficiency test shall inform the relevant parties of the results of the proficiency testing activities after the completion of the proficiency testing activities. At the same time, the results of the proficiency test are reported to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration, and the National Certification and Accreditation Administration regularly publishes a list of laboratories with satisfactory results.
Article 14 The laboratory and the proficiency test provider who have achieved satisfactory results may be exempted from the on-site test of the project when they accept the laboratory qualification and laboratory accreditation assessment within the specified time.
All relevant parties are encouraged to use the results of proficiency testing to give priority to recommending or selecting laboratories that have achieved satisfactory results to undertake government inspection, authorization or designated inspection and testing tasks.
Article 15 The organizer of proficiency testing shall implement effective management of the proficiency testing provider and the implementation process of proficiency testing.
Article 16 For laboratories whose performance verification results are suspicious or outliers, the organizer of the proficiency test shall require them to rectify and verify the rectification effect within the prescribed time limit, and may also suspend or revoke the qualification certification of their related projects or may To suspend the eligibility of the government for authorization, commission, or designated inspection and testing tasks until the corrective activity is completed and confirmed by the proficiency-certified organizer before resuming or re-acquiring and undertaking government authorization, commission, or designated inspections Qualification of the task.
Article 17 If the provider of proficiency testing violates professional ethics, falsifies or reveals confidentiality, the National Certification and Accreditation Administration or the organizer of proficiency testing shall cancel the qualifications of the provider of the proficiency test.
Participants in the proficiency test are fraudulent and collusive. If the investigation is true, the proficiency test organizer will be dissatisfied with the result. If the circumstances are bad, the proficiency verification organizer shall report to the National Certification and Accreditation Administration, and the National Certification and Accreditation Administration shall cancel the qualifications for the testing of its corresponding projects.
Article 18 The State Certification and Accreditation Administration may supervise laboratory proficiency testing activities by organizing expert review, soliciting opinions from laboratories, spotting files, requiring organizers of capability verification, and reporting on the implementation of proficiency testing.
Article 19 If the participant who has the ability to verify has any objection to the result of the proficiency test, he may appeal to the proficiency verification organizer; the violation may be reported to the proficiency verification organizer or the National Certification and Accreditation Administration.
Article 20: The meaning of the following terms:
The provider of proficiency testing referred to in these Measures refers to the laboratory that is engaged in the design and implementation of proficiency testing.
Participants in the proficiency test referred to in these Procedures refer to laboratories participating in inter-laboratory comparisons to determine calibration or testing capabilities.
The suspicious results referred to in these Measures refer to the results of the proficiency test results determined by the relevant technical statistical methods between the standard recognized values ​​(or median values).
The out-of-group (ie, out-of-group) referred to in this approach refers to the result of a significant deviation from the standard value (or median value) determined according to the relevant technical statistical methods.
Article 21 The National Certification and Accreditation Administration is responsible for the interpretation of these Measures.
Article 22 These Measures shall come into force on May 1, 2006.
The authenticity of this information has not been confirmed by the international electrical network, for your reference only.
Kenzo Air Purifier,Air Freshener Aromatic,Water Air Purifier
Fenghua Jade Motor Co., Ltd. , http://www.homeappliancemfg.com