The existing copyright system must be changed, and “creative sharing” is the future

Two very famous download stations recently announced they were closed. One is "everybody's movie" and the other is "shooter network". The former was famous for providing movie and TV drama downloads while the latter did not provide movie and TV drama downloads, but provided “subtitles for movies and television dramas”.

Everyone is suspected of piracy and infringement, so its closure is not very strange. However, Shooter.com only provides translated subtitles for downloading, and there is no download of the film and television itself. Is it also infringing? (Before the author of the titanium media in the "everyone can understand the infringement of television, then why shooter network closed?" Also discussed.)

The answer is clear: Yes. Copyright includes more than a dozen rights under the property rights, of which "right to translation" is impressively on the list. In other words, if you do not have the permission of the copyright owner to translate and mass-transmit a work, it is infringement. Some copyright owners will give up some of the rights in property rights (such as abandoning translation rights), but in general, the copyright holders of film and television works will not give up. All Rights Reserved - This phrase we often see indicates that copyright holders have not given up any rights.
Therefore, the closing of Shooter Network is most likely related to "infringement." In terms of the nature of this issue, it is the same as that of the movie and TV drama download directly by everyone: it is suspected of piracy.

However, the results of these two websites due to infringement are different.

two

Copyright is never a moral issue but a commercial issue. Most infringement cases are not lawsuits against personal rights, but rather property rights.

The multimedia of the Internet is nothing more than text, pictures, audio, and video. The operators of the latter two are far more concerned with their rights than the former two. (Only the fiction website is considered to be important for the rights and interests of the texts, but the importance of the video exceeds that of the audio). Without it, the interest is relatively bigger. The cost of taking a 5-minute drama is far more than writing a 2,000-word article. More importantly, due to the large profits, the amount of money bought and sold by the video is a huge number – once the Chinese TV series was sold to more than one million episodes. If a company is rich enough to invest in enough copyright purchases, then it can use copyright as a weapon to expel capital-rich competitors. The copyright reserve of video websites is a real-life asset. And those websites that publish news and comments every day, never say how many news and many reviews I have stored - they haven't looked at it as assets.

So, this matter of copyright, to put it plainly, competition strategy. When everyone is a bachelor proletarian, no one will take it seriously. Some individuals have production, and naturally they have the rules of the producers. The person or the person, the company or the company, from the pirates to the copyrights, strongly believes that the ethical level has advanced by leaps and bounds, but the purse has gone by.

In September 2009, the China Cyber ​​Video Anti-Piracy Alliance was launched in Beijing. At that time, the organization's members were mainly Sohu.com, Excited and Leading Friends Pollock, and they had more than 100 rights holders. The main complaints were video sites like Youku and Tudou. Sohu even initiated a lawsuit claiming Youku for 50 million to 100 million yuan. After a month, the league once again launched a campaign in Shenzhen. The object of this complaint is mainly directed at Thunder.

After a few years of silence, at the end of 13 years, this alliance was again in action. This time, Baidu and fast broadcast are the targets. Quite interestingly, You Yong’s boss (also the controller of potatoes) sat down on the side of Sohu Zhang Chaoyang and condemned all the evil pirates. Tencent, the so-called “King of the Cottage” on the rivers and lakes, also began to talk about “IP” (Intellectual Property) at the just-concluded Wuzhen Internet Conference.

The world’s most rigorous copyright legislation is probably the Americans. Their “Digital Millennial Digital Copyright Law” has even been overkill by even the United States’ own legal scholars. For example, Lesiger wrote a book to criticize. However, what many people may not know is that when the United States first established the country, there were genuine books to read. Most of them were pirated from Europe.

The copyright game fully shows that if a market is barefoot, it is naturally brutal competition. Whenever several people put on shoes, they will ask the barefoot to be out in the name of "shoes," or if you wear shoes with me, then see who has the money to buy more shoes.

three

The copyright owner, in most cases, is not a natural person but an institution.

For example, many publishers are copyright holders of publications (such as books)—at least as writers and copyright holders. This book is clearly written by the American Smith. Chinese Zhang San wants to translate into Chinese. Can Smith agree?

no. In general, Smith does not refuse to translate his English works into Chinese. But Smith has no right to unilaterally decide this matter. If Smith is big enough, he can still have a certain amount of say. If it is not so big, this matter is basically decided by the publisher of Smith's English works.

Therefore, if you want to translate into Chinese, you do not want to. The publishing society of Smith's English book asks for a fee in return for your translation of the license.

Under such a mechanism, sometimes this happens: Zhang San thinks that Smith's book is very good and he intends to translate. When I contacted Smith's publishing house at the time, the latter told him that we had already sold it to a publishing house in China. But you can't find the Chinese translation of this book. The reason is simple. After the buyer bought it, it was there.

This situation is rare in the field of bestsellers, but it is extremely common in the field of serious academic books.

Lesder, the famous American jurist who was mentioned earlier, hated such things. He was big enough, so when he went out of the book code 2, he insisted on using the "CC license, creative sharing" approach. Now, Zhang San wants to translate Lesder's book. No foreigner's publishing company has anything to do with it, and he doesn't even need to specifically get Lesage's consent. Because Lestrade has given up "translation rights."

four

I often express my views on the "hatred of the existing copyright system." The opponent is usually the one who says: Without the copyright system, what else can you see?

Those who spoke these things really did not understand the copyright system and did not understand the existing copyright system. Copyrights can be waived by copyright holders.

After some transformation, the world has something like "creative commons", and Chinese is called "creative sharing." Sometimes, people call this new and modified copyright system “CopyLeft” based on the English CopyRight of the old copyright. CopyRight is usually followed by the sentence "All Rights Reserved", but CopyLeft is giving up some rights, such as: various kinds of property rights (personal rights are still preserved, such as requiring signature).

The copyright system has an impediment to communication. Because it usually takes you to pay. But I also do not oppose that for the copyright owner, creating a work is costly. Everyone does not pay, at least the entertainment industry is basically finished. How to balance the issue of the income of the copyright owner and the smoothness of the dissemination requires a balance among them. CopyLeft, from the current point of view, is a good compromise.

100-300w high wattage IP67 Aluminum housing series, CE/ROHS/SAA/ETL/TUV/EMC,Input voltage can be both 110V and 220V, DALI/TRIAC/0-10V/PUSH dimmable and non dimmable, flicker free,noise free,load free, Perfect dimming curve, PF>0.95,constant current 350mA 700mA 900mA 1200mA,constant voltage 12V 24V 36V, parameters can be customization,OEM/ODM is supported,Same appearances but different sizes, forming a perfect product line,Use for led panel light,led strip light and other indoor led lights

100-300W High Wattage LED DRIVER

100W High Wattage LED Driver,300W LED Driver,High Wattage LED Driver,100W / 120W / 250W / 200W / 240W / 300W LED Driver,Dimmable 300W LED Driver,0-10V 200W LED Driver,150W Dimmable LED Driver

HAURUI LIGHTING CO.,LTD , http://www.huaruileddriver.com